The Smile Has to Hold
A Case Study of Remain Calm (2026)
Written by Joshua Allen
Founder and Executive Director, The Atlantis Awards
“The audience must be able to see the fear that the creature must not.”
The Atlantis Awards Case Studies are not reviews. They examine the filmmaking choices through which a work produces its effects. This study follows the finished film, with production accounts used to clarify its construction rather than determine its interpretation.
Content notice: Full spoilers; creature violence, dismemberment, blood effects, strong language, and sexual humor.
Explore the Lewis Brothers Filmography
Four short films. Four stages of a filmmaker’s evolution. Follow our reverse-chronological exploration of Jake Lewis’s work, tracing the creative journey from his most recent production back to the early short that helped bring him widespread attention.
Two convenience-store employees confront a creature that senses fear, turning the simple act of smiling into a desperate struggle for survival.
Behind the spectacle of a television appearance, Richard Simmons notices a man whom everyone around him seems to overlook.
Jack Nicholson and John Belushi collide on the set of a Hollywood Western, where larger-than-life personalities challenge the machinery of filmmaking.
A recreation of Robin Williams behind the scenes of Mork & Mindy explores the delicate boundary between celebrity impersonation and dramatic performance.
The Face Arrives Before the Warning
The man at the counter is smiling. His suit is immaculate, his gestures precise, and his courtesy considerably more elaborate than the transaction requires. His eyes are less reassuring. They keep assessing the room while his mouth insists that there is nothing to worry about.
Doug Jones’s Grin Man has arrived to explain a danger that makes explaining it difficult. Something has escaped from a government facility, it responds to signs of stress, and the people sharing the convenience store with it must remain calm. Before he can give the employees information that might frighten them, he has to persuade them to look happy.
Written and directed by Jake Lewis, Remain Calm places Pauly Shore’s Matt and Nick Swardson’s Erwin on the receiving end of that instruction, with Kevin Keppy playing the creature, Mr. Frett. Its central performance problem is also its central filmmaking problem: the audience must recognize the fear that the characters are trying to conceal. A completely convincing smile would remove much of the comedy. An expression that contained nothing but panic would remove the effort on which the suspense depends.
The film keeps both expressions available. Its camera gives us time to inspect their coexistence, while its editing alternately protects that time and takes it away. The comic passages are not simply intervals between attacks. They show people trying to produce the behavior that might prevent one.
A Small Amount of Happiness
Before the warning arrives, Matt and Erwin are already disagreeing about how to get through the shift. Matt wants conversation. Erwin wants him to stop manufacturing it. A question about the best song of the 2000s becomes another demand for participation, and Swardson makes the reluctance sufficiently ordinary that it needs no explanation beyond the situation: these men work together, but that does not mean they want the same evening.
Shore gives Matt a familiar social looseness without turning him into an impersonation of his younger comic persona. The playful cadence and easy presumption of companionship retain something of the Weasel, but the circumstances have aged around the manner. His friendliness now belongs to a man in a work uniform trying to make an unpromising night more agreeable. The nostalgia, for viewers who bring it, has a character to inhabit.
Erwin prefers his phone. Matt asks him to stop scrolling and be present; Erwin defends TikTok as a source of information. Their disagreement establishes two different uses of attention. Matt looks for something they can enjoy together. Erwin looks for something that does not require him to negotiate with the person beside him.
The chip exchange gives Matt’s position a physical object. Erwin is avoiding processed food. Matt holds up a cheese-dusted triangle and considers the civilization capable of producing it. The close framing allows the examination to become an event: the chip is raised, regarded, explained, and finally eaten. Its immediate usefulness is pleasure, but Shore treats that usefulness with enough sincerity to make the disproportion funny.
The film does not need to decide whether Matt has won an argument about nutrition. His defense of instant gratification tells us how he approaches his circumstances. The chip cannot improve the job, but it can improve the next few seconds. Erwin’s objection is reasonable on a different timetable.
A favorite song, a phone, and something to eat have entered through an ordinary workplace conversation. Later, they will become things the men attempt to use. Their eventual importance does not prevent them from doing useful character work now.
Even the bathroom warning belongs to this register. The toilet seat will not stay up. It is a minor defect that an employee knows well enough to repeat, offered with none of the emphasis that its later consequence might seem to warrant. The short gives the warning a plausible reason to exist before making it a piece of horror construction.
A customer passing toward the restroom receives similarly limited attention. In Everett Durand’s first behind-the-scenes diary, he explains that Keppy was not scheduled for the first shooting night. To obtain a rear-facing monster shot, the crew put another person in a trench coat and had them walk along a plank supported by apple boxes. The fleeting passage around 1:38 appears to be the finished-film use of that arrangement.
The illusion depends upon the shot’s limited demand. We need an unusual height, a coat, and a direction of travel, not a face or a sustained performance. The employees’ inattention helps the image avoid examination. What they barely register, the production can suggest with a substitute.
The Agent Has Practiced
The Grin Man is harder to ignore because his reassurance looks rehearsed. Jones arranges the smile alongside careful hand movements, a formal posture, and an insistence on maintaining the encounter’s pleasantness. When the employees question the expression, he explains that it should put them at ease. Its conspicuousness has already made that difficult.
Jones does not sustain one unchanging grin. His eyes search, widen, and briefly settle; his brows register information that the lower half of his face tries to accommodate. At moments, the mouth tightens or loses some of its presentation before he restores it. The transitions are small enough to remain beneath the larger theatrical behavior, but they keep that behavior from becoming a single comic mask.
The exaggeration therefore belongs to the agent’s performance, not to an absence of psychological detail. Jones plays someone who knows what expression the assignment requires and has to keep putting it back on. The smile is large because maintaining it is work. The eyes make the work visible.
His effort to get Matt and Erwin laughing before he explains the threat turns exposition into an action scene of a different kind. The information cannot simply be delivered. Its reception has to be managed. Every additional fact risks producing the very reaction his instructions forbid.
The stated rule concerns body language. Smiling is the agent’s practical recommendation, not a demonstrated guarantee of safety. That distinction leaves the performances room to develop: the mouth can obey while breathing, posture, eyes, and voice continue announcing distress. The film asks us to watch the mismatch rather than assume that showing teeth has settled it.
The syringe he carries supplies another expression of professional readiness. Durand’s first diary credits production designer Alen Stubbs with constructing the prop from materials available on set. The finished object belongs comfortably to the agent’s equipment, and the performance gives it apparent familiarity. Its improvised manufacture is not something the scene needs to disclose.
As the agent moves away from the counter, cinematographer Emil Gurvin’s wider framing gives Jones’s whole body room to perform its composure. Matt and Erwin remain visible behind him. Then an endcap crosses the foreground and briefly blocks our view. The image emerges at a substantially tighter scale.
The passage appears to conceal a punch-in beneath the obstruction. The change in proximity is hidden inside the store’s ordinary geography, so accompanying the agent becomes inspecting him without an exposed edit announcing the adjustment. At a distance, the posture is funny. Closer, the effort around his eyes becomes harder to miss.
The Room Gets There First
The approach to the bathroom and the initial inspection play as an apparent continuous shot. The agent knocks politely, opens the door, and encounters a dark interior. Then he turns on the light. The scene allows a sensible adjustment instead of treating darkness as something a character must inexplicably accept.
The longer passage gives each stage of the search its own interval. There is clothing on the floor, a stall to approach, a door to open, and nobody waiting inside. The absence redirects him toward the toilet. He begins greeting whatever might be beneath the lid with the same solicitous manner he brought to the counter.
The reveal is disgusting rather than monstrous. He fans his nose, keeps smiling, and describes the experience as pleasant. The joke develops from the refusal to supply the appropriate reaction: disgust has to be translated into appreciation before it becomes visible.
This is a smaller version of the task ahead. The agent is not merely keeping himself from screaming. He is policing the expression of any unpleasant experience, attempting to make the body present a different account of what it has encountered. The toilet gives Jones a low-stakes opportunity to demonstrate the method before the film makes it impossible.
Elsewhere in the composition, the ceiling vent is already open. The reverse angle establishes it without isolating it as a clue, and the agent’s body obscures it as he leans forward. Only after the toilet business does he turn and notice it himself.
The sequence separates information from attention. The opening is available before either the character or the scene treats it as important. Blocking removes it from view, the disgusting reveal redirects us, and the agent’s turn restores the detail under different conditions. The audience can discover the vent early without the film requiring everyone to have done so.
When he raises his head into the ventilation system, the search becomes spatially explicit. After an initial exchange of angles, the inspection of three directions plays in another apparent continuous passage. Each direction takes time to check. An empty stretch of ductwork does not resolve the search; it transfers uncertainty to the next one.
Something becomes visible in the darkness. Monstrous breathing and a restrained musical punctuation sharpen the discovery, while Jones responds with appreciative laughter. The smile has not disappeared, but it is now being maintained in circumstances that expose its purpose.
There is a particularly delightful dimension to this brief confrontation that becomes apparent when considering the performers behind the characters. Kevin Keppy has spoken about Doug Jones as an early inspiration for his own creature-performance work, recalling how Jones’s appearance as one of the Gentlemen in Buffy the Vampire Slayer helped shape his interest in the craft. Now, the two performers meet in a scene that reverses their familiar relationship to the monstrous. Jones, whose career has been defined in part by the humanity he brings to extraordinary creatures, appears without elaborate creature makeup, playing a terrified human being. Keppy, the performer he helped inspire, occupies the darkness before him. For a few remarkable moments, Doug Jones is no longer the creature audiences fear. He is the man being frightened by one. The reversal adds a lovely layer of professional history to an encounter that already works entirely on its own terms.
The Noise He Wasn't Warned About
The toilet seat falls while the agent is looking at the creature. The malfunction has been mentioned twice, turned into the setting for a gross joke, and left below him. Its return is startling because his attention is elsewhere, not because the film has invented a new threat.
That gives the beat a different function from a false scare that briefly raises tension and releases it. The falling seat is not the monster, but the reaction it produces matters to the monster encounter. The ordinary noise catches the agent before his deliberate presentation can absorb it.
His smile breaks, and the underlying panic becomes unmistakable. He has prepared himself to confront something frightening. He has not made himself incapable of being surprised.
The scream travels out through the shop’s ventilation system. The camera moves continuously across the ceiling and lands near the employees, giving sound a route between the isolated encounter and the main room. The ductwork is now both a hiding place and a connection. The scene does not have to cut directly from the agent’s distress to the men’s response; the building carries us between them.
When Matt and Erwin enter the bathroom, the image briefly supports a mundane explanation. The Grin Man is above the sink. Erwin complains that he has just cleaned it and tells him not to stand there. Matt notices that the feet are not supported.
The joke occupies the interval between those readings. Erwin sees a customer creating more work. Matt sees that the body is being held from somewhere else. The closer view of the shoe corrects the first interpretation without needing an explanatory speech.
Then the agent is jerked upward in a single violent movement. The familiar workplace complaint has not interrupted the horror; it has delayed recognition long enough for the horror to revise it.
Make Him Smile
Matt and Erwin run through the store while disturbances travel above them. The passage again appears continuous, keeping their flight and the overhead pursuit in the same unfolding space. The creature remains unseen, but the vent housings buckle and dust bursts into the room.
Those environmental disturbances read as digital augmentation of the photographed location. That is an interpretation of their appearance, not a confirmed breakdown of the effects. Their dramatic function is clear: the building registers movement that the film does not otherwise show. The creature can stay ahead of the men without being repeatedly exposed in separate views.
Once they stop, Matt recalls the agent’s instructions and attempts to make them usable. His hands go to Erwin’s face. Reassurance becomes a physical task, with one frightened man trying to keep another man’s mouth arranged correctly.
The relationship established before the threat remains active. Matt is still initiating an exchange that Erwin does not welcome. His insistence now has an urgent purpose, but urgency has not made him better at choosing his approach.
He tries singing “Hide and Seek,” the song Erwin named earlier, and immediately reveals that he does not know it. The artist’s name also sounds closer to “Emoji Heap” than Imogen Heap. His attempted consolation is assembled from information he has retained without fully understanding.
The joke is not merely that Matt sings badly. He is trying to make an earlier conversational connection perform work it cannot support. Yet the attempt also preserves his concern: he remembers what Erwin said, and he is searching for something that might reach him.
When Matt asks what relaxes Erwin most, the first answer is masturbation. He rejects that proposal and redirects him toward alcohol. The exchange keeps the crude humor inside the practical problem rather than stopping the scene to introduce an unrelated routine. They are searching their familiar pleasures for something that might make their bodies less frightened.
Matt proposes collecting beers, drinking them, and walking calmly to the car. The exit is visible, the creature seems to have a location, and Erwin receives a simple assignment: watch the vent and report any movement. Matt’s solution requires their attention to become cooperative.
The film does not abandon that cooperation merely because it is inept. Shore continues trying to manage both the situation and his coworker, while Swardson gives Erwin’s objections enough force to prevent reassurance from becoming easy. Their comedy is now the effort to keep a plan functioning while neither participant believes the circumstances are manageable.
Stay With the Cooler
Matt removes a beer from the cooler, and the gap reveals the creature’s face. The thing he has selected to calm them has been concealing the thing they need calming about.
The subsequent wider shot stays at the cooler for approximately fifteen seconds. Matt recoils and scuttles out of frame. Another can falls after he has gone, then more follow. The image does not leave with the person whose fear initiated it. We remain watching the opening he has abandoned until the first hand reaches out.
The duration allows small events to change their meaning. A dropped beer initially belongs to Matt’s startled withdrawal. Further cans imply activity continuing behind the door. Each falling object makes the unseen body more present without showing it, and the eventual hand arrives after the audience has had time to anticipate something larger.
A closer shot introduces the other hand. The creature’s head and torso then slide into view. Instead of treating the face behind the cans as a complete reveal, the film extends the emergence through a succession of physical tasks.
Keppy gives those tasks distinct shapes. Mr. Frett can crouch, unfold, orient its head, extend a hand, straighten, and begin approaching. The elongated body remains active after the surprise of its appearance has passed. His professional biography traces a background in computer animation and design, followed by substantial theater work and screen roles in Smile, Guillermo del Toro’s Cabinet of Curiosities, and Evil. The relevant contribution here is the sustained physical performance, not simply a recognizable résumé beneath the makeup.
The pairing with Jones offers a useful reversal. Jones makes the human character’s social presentation look manufactured while allowing a frightened person to remain visible underneath it. Keppy makes the manufactured creature look inhabited. Both performances depend on more than the face.
Gorgazma is credited with the creature design and special effects. Durand’s second production diary describes the creature as predominantly practical, including electronically controlled eye movement. The detail belongs directly to the premise: a being that evaluates body language needs looking to register as an activity. The eyes, the orientation of the head, and Keppy’s bodily attention combine to make the stare feel directed.
The same diary describes Lewis and Keppy trying several possibilities for the entrance so there would be alternatives available in the edit. A monitor image shows a hand reaching between the beer cans, an action absent from the finished sequence. That image documents an option, not the execution of the released reveal.
The distinction makes the production account more useful. The final construction retains the face in the gap, gives Matt time to withdraw, stays for the falling cans, and brings the hands around the doorway. The photographed alternatives supplied choices; the finished arrangement determines when each piece of the creature becomes available.
Durand reports three overnight shooting days, generally beginning around 7 p.m. and continuing until approximately 6:30 or 7 the next morning. The second location night ended only twenty minutes before the premises needed to be cleared for business. The film’s patience therefore should not be confused with an unlimited schedule. Its long holds are choices made within a production that still had to obtain coverage, troubleshoot effects, and return the store to ordinary use.
Erwin’s response brings the attention problem back into the scene. Matt demands to know why he did not report movement. The vent he was watching did not move. Then it opens and the Grin Man’s severed head drops into his space.
His observation was narrowly accurate and useless to the person depending on it. The film has separated the place Erwin is watching from the place where the danger appears, allowing the same arrangement to produce a reveal, a misunderstanding, and another involuntary expression of fear.
Four Frames of Movement
Once Mr. Frett rises to its full height, the cutting does not immediately accelerate. The alternating views give the creature time to stalk and Matt time to retreat. One approaching-creature shot lasts approximately 5.67 seconds; the following high-angle view of Matt lasts approximately 6.59 seconds. The intervals are growing while the distance is shrinking.
Matt keeps smiling, but the rest of him is becoming increasingly difficult to pass off as happy. His voice strains, his body retreats, and his appeals to Erwin become angry. Erwin’s screaming continues beyond the frame, making another person’s fear something Matt has to hear while attempting to conceal his own.
“Stop screaming, asshole” places the contradiction inside a single instruction. Matt is trying to create calm by shouting at someone who cannot stop being frightened. The smile remains part of the effort, not evidence that the effort has succeeded.
For much of this passage, the creature’s approach is measurable. It takes steps. Matt moves backward. The shelves provide depth and repeated objects against which their positions can be judged. The film gives us enough time to understand the aisle before disrupting how movement through it works.
The explosive forward burst occupies the final four displayed frames of the wide creature shot. A separate close insert of the creature’s face follows for six frames. In the examined 23.976-frame-per-second copy, the burst and insert together occupy approximately 0.42 seconds. The wide shot contains a longer preparation before those final four frames; it is the decisive advance, not the entire shot, that is compressed so radically.
The positions are conspicuously crisp. Rather than allowing us to follow a smooth acceleration, the image presents abrupt changes of posture and proximity. A torso pitches, a body advances, and the remaining distance disappears in steps too large to feel like ordinary locomotion.
Those sharply separated positions suggest a lunge assembled from deliberately posed images rather than simply a continuous rush played faster. That remains a reading of the finished effect. The poses might have been staged separately or selected from moving footage; the release does not establish the acquisition method. What it makes visible is the absence of the connecting movement we would ordinarily expect.
The result is not only speed. The creature appears to move with pieces missing from its motion. The aisle has been made understandable, then becomes impossible to use as protection. Knowing how far away the body is ceases to tell Matt—or the audience—how much time remains.
The six-frame face insert completes the change of scale. A full body at a readable distance becomes an immediate confrontation with the face, and the film cuts away before that new proximity can stabilize.
The following shot of Erwin lasts approximately seven and a half seconds. Blood arrives later within that continuous reaction, so the image has time to hold anticipation, impact, and response rather than reducing him to a brief witness insert.
This is the decisive rhythmic contrast in Jenna Socha’s credited edit. The stalking is extended, the attack compressed, and the reaction extended again. Describing the sequence only as fast cutting would miss the duration on either side of the violence. We spend far longer watching somebody try to endure the consequence than watching the action that produces it.
The blood-spattered grin also permits an obscene visual association: a face struck by bodily fluid while its owner attempts to present pleasure can recall a pornographic facial. That is a possible secondary reading, not a production claim. The immediate contradiction needs no such association to function. Erwin must make an appalling experience look enjoyable.
The Phone Provides the Face
Erwin opens TikTok. A fragment of a “get ready with me” video gives way to another piece of content, and he concentrates on the feed while trying to smile. The earlier argument about his phone has become a question of what can keep his attention away from the room.
The film complicates any simple dismissal of that behavior. Scrolling does not create the creature, and looking up would not make the circumstances less horrific. The distraction appears to help him survive. Its limitation is not that it provides nothing, but that its usefulness lasts only while the replacement experience remains available.
The chips return under the same conditions. Erwin, who rejected processed food, is eventually found among opened bags and scattered snacks. Matt’s defense of immediate gratification survives him. The resources introduced during the opening conversation have become tools for enduring the night without acknowledging it.
Lewis has publicly described the premise through “aggressive positivity,” connecting its performed happiness to cheerful online presentation amid frightening circumstances. That stated intention corresponds with the film’s subject, but the dramatic construction gives it a more specific difficulty: the characters are not simply wrong to seek distraction. They occupy a world in which displaying an appropriate response to danger can expose them to more of it.
The sound and image begin performing a related withdrawal. Cheerful music takes over as the film moves outside to aerial and landscape views. The night gives way to morning while the interior experience is left behind. The score, credited to Eric Scullin, with theme music credited to Scullin and Jake Lewis, allows the transition to sound agreeable without changing what has happened.
The film can now appear calm because it has stopped looking at the person doing the work of remaining so. The exterior interval gives the audience a release that Erwin has had to construct for himself through the phone.
That difference becomes visible when the camera returns inside. Morning has arrived, but his predicament has not ended.
The Work Continues
Two more men in dark suits enter, both smiling. Their arrival changes the Grin Man’s presentation from an individual eccentricity into what looks like an occupational practice. The costume recurs, the expression recurs, and the newcomers recognize enough of the situation to tell Erwin not to stop scrolling.
The opening request has reversed. Matt wanted him to put the phone away and share the room. The arriving agents want him to keep using it while they get him out. Attention to the surrounding world is no longer being presented as the more responsible action.
Then the battery dies. Erwin reports the failure, and the creature appears behind him as the expression loses its support. The film cuts to the title, allowing the command to occupy the screen while screams and the sounds of flesh tearing make compliance unimaginable.
Even that is not the final image. The agents reappear, laughing and acknowledging that they are probably going to lose their jobs. Their response returns the extraordinary event to the language of employment, where the film began.
The laughter can read as bureaucratic callousness. Under the rule already established, it can also read as another attempt at self-preservation. They may need to keep laughing whatever they think of the death in front of them. The short leaves both possibilities available, making the professional reassurance less comforting rather than supplying an authoritative explanation.
There is a corresponding uncertainty in the creature’s rule. The film is more precise about the effort to obey than about the threshold at which obedience succeeds. A smile remains visible while Matt is attacked; Erwin’s distress can continue while the creature’s attention is elsewhere. The performances make those moments emotionally legible without turning the premise into a reproducible test of what amount of fear is safe.
That is part of the short’s formal bargain. It spends its time examining attempts at composure rather than explaining a complete system of detection. The audience is asked to follow the people’s deteriorating ability to maintain the performance, not to solve the creature as though it were a mechanism with a dependable switch.
The same expressive action has changed function across the film. Matt begins with a genuine attempt to find something pleasant. The Grin Man arrives with an expression maintained professionally. Matt subsequently tries to manufacture one for Erwin, then hold his own while retreating. Erwin eventually delegates the effort to a stream of images on his phone. The final agents inherit the smile without inheriting any assurance that they can control the outcome.
Camera placement and duration keep those changes distinct. The film watches an ordinary snack long enough for pleasure to become funny, stays with the bathroom search long enough for composure to become strenuous, and holds the cooler after Matt leaves so that absence can accumulate into an entrance. At the attack, four frames destroy the distance that the longer shots have made readable. The reaction then gives the frightened face time to become the scene.
Comedy and horror do not have to take turns because the smile is doing work for both. We recognize its absurdity and the terror beneath it at the same time. The film’s final joke leaves the remaining workers laughing, still apparently on duty, still required to produce the expression appropriate to a world that is not the one in front of them.
The laughter is real. The happiness is not.
Editorial Postscript
Version note. This study concerns the public YouTube presentation of Remain Calm, with a displayed runtime of approximately 14:23, including its post-title scene and credits. The detailed attack measurements refer to the examined 1280 × 720 file running at 24000/1001 frames per second. Other timestamps describe approximate elapsed playback positions rather than frame-accurate boundaries.
Credits. The supplied end-credit captures identify Jake Lewis as writer-director; Emil Gurvin as director of photography; Jenna Socha as editor; Alen Stubbs for production design; Bonnie Tyler for costumes; Eric Scullin for music; and Jake Lewis and Scullin for theme music. Gorgazma receives creature-design and special-effects credits. FNT Productions, Tyler Shanklin, and Federico Friciello receive visual-effects credits; Cooper Shine is credited as colorist, and Reid Anderson and Kaili Scheer for post-production sound. These credits establish roles, not individual authorship of every decision discussed.
A note on sourcing. Scene descriptions and formal analysis draw on the chronological viewing record, timestamped screenshots, repeated playback annotations, and the native-frame examination of the final attack. Production details attributed to Everett Durand derive from the first two behind-the-scenes diaries. Those accounts document the overnight schedule, substitute performer, syringe construction, practical creature work, electronically controlled eyes, and alternative entrance material.
The identification of the 1:38 glimpse with the plank-and-trench-coat setup, the concealed punch-in behind the endcap, the apparently digital vent damage, and the proposed use of posed images in the lunge are interpretations rather than confirmed production methods. “Apparent continuous shot” describes the continuity experienced in the finished film without claiming that no hidden join exists.
Keppy’s background is drawn from his official biography. Lewis’s “aggressive positivity” explanation is available in FandomWire’s reproduction of comments attributed to Collider; it is treated as published filmmaker commentary, not as the source of the scene analysis. No filmmaker interview conducted for this study is used to authorize its interpretation.
Source links
- Kevin Keppy official biography: https://kevinkeppy.com/about/
- Public filmmaker commentary: https://fandomwire.com/remain-calm-doug-jones-youtube-free-streaming/
- Film announcement/context: https://www.movievine.com/movies/horror-comedy-film-remain-calm-stars-pauly-shore-nick-swardson-doug-jones-trailer-and-release-date/
- Everett Durand Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_everettdurand_/